INDIAN ARMED FORCES CHIEFS ON
OUR RELENTLESS AND FOCUSED PUBLISHING EFFORTS

 
SP Guide Publications puts forth a well compiled articulation of issues, pursuits and accomplishments of the Indian Army, over the years

— General Manoj Pande, Indian Army Chief

 
 
I am confident that SP Guide Publications would continue to inform, inspire and influence.

— Admiral R. Hari Kumar, Indian Navy Chief

My compliments to SP Guide Publications for informative and credible reportage on contemporary aerospace issues over the past six decades.

— Air Chief Marshal V.R. Chaudhari, Indian Air Force Chief
       

Judge fines for safety breaches on worksite

Issue No. 8 | April 16-30, 2014

Matthew Skeet (19) and Kevin Ruffles (57) were killed when the gable wall of a barn conversion they were working on in Worlingworth collapsed and fell on them on October 21, 2010. Ipswich firm Elliston Steady & Hawes, the site contractor, and Barry Potts, 65, a structural engineer from Freston, appeared before Ipswich Crown Court, having previously pleaded guilty to health and safety offences at an earlier hearing.

The incident was investigated by the Joint Norfolk and Suffolk Major Investigation Team, working closely with the Health and Safety Executive.

Last June Potts was summonsed to court for two counts of manslaughter by gross negligence and one offence under the health and safety act, and legal representatives for a local building were issued summons for two offences under the health and safety act. At a hearing at Southwark Crown Court in December, guilty pleas were offered on behalf of Potts and ESH in relation to health and safety breaches.

Justice Rabinder Singh acknowledged there was never any suggestion ESH’s failing had caused the two men’s deaths, and said no cause could be proven with Potts’ failings. However, he said, Potts had fallen “well below the standards expected by him of the health and safety at work act” and fined him £15,000, ordering him to pay a further £5,000 in costs.

And although he agreed that ESH was “entitled to rely upon” Potts to carry out the work safely, Singh said its failure to ensure that written statements were provided, constituted a “serious breach” and fined the firm £45,000, ordering it to pay a further £15,000 in costs.